TISSUE COMPOSITION OF CARCASSES IN INTENSIVE FATTENED YOUNG SHEEP
Abstract
The Merino of Cluj (M), Tsigai and Turcana lambs were fattened during 100 days, within a three phases experiment: adaptation (15 days) – 16% DCP, growing - fattening (65 days) – 15% DCP, finishing (20 days) – 13% DCP Two experimental series were performed – 2004 (series I) and 2005 (series II). The initial weight was around 15.5 kg, and final 38.40 – 40.78 kg. After slaughtering (n = 5), the tissue composition of the carcasses was determined by butchery regions, Ist, IInd quality and carcass rest. The differences between breds concerning the tissular composition of the ham, cutlet, back + arm, and carcass rest recorded variations function of the breeding lebel of all three studied breeds. The highest meat quantitz was recorded in Merino of Cluj ham (> 65%), compared to Tsigai (P <0.01) and Turcana (P <0.001). The highest fat proportion ws recorded in Turcana with 34.44% higher compared to Merino of Cluj (P <0.001) or 15.10% compared to Tsigai (P <0.05). The cutlet contains less meat compared to ham, back or even carcass rest, and the highest fat content. The highest meat quantity in cutlet was recorded in Merino of Cluj – 59.06%, and the lowest in Turcana – 52.54%. Very significant differences were recorded (P <0.001), between Merino of Cluj and both other studied breeds Tsigai and Turcana. Distinct significant differences were recorded between Turcana and Tsigai (P <0.01). The meat quantity from the back and arm regions recorded significant differences (P <0.05) between Merino of Cluj and Tsigai, and distinct significant between (P <0.01) Merino of Cluj and Turcana and Turcana and Tsigai.a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).