A Comparison between Hungarian and Romanian Honey Consumption
AbstractHoney consumption behaviour varies from one country to another, from one population toanother. Although Romania and Hungary are in the top of the European honey producers, the domesticconsumption is low. Starting in these circumstances, the study aims to conduct a comparative analysisof honey consumption behaviour in the two countries, and to identify the factors determining it. Theresearch method used was the sociologic survey. Studies were conducted in 2008 and 2010 in Hungaryand in 2007 and 2012 in Romania, as part of the authorsâ€™ doctoral and postdoctoral research. Thus, theassumptions made were as it follows: H1. Honey consumption behaviour is determined by certainsocio-demographic characteristics; H2. There is a link between the adoption of a healthy lifestyle andthe honey consumption. Following the conducted investigations, the conclusion may be that, forRomania, the two hypotheses can be fully accepted. This can be explained by the fact that Romanianswere always open to the alternative medicine. In the case of Hungary, the first hypothesis is totallyaccepted and the second only partially. Hungarian consumers associate the honey consumption with itshealth benefits but in a lessened proportion. The originality of the study derives from its innovativecharacter at a European level.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).