Morphocytometric Evaluation of Equine Oocytes Following In Vitro Maturation
Abstract
In the current study, 930 equine oocytes were collected, 765 (82.25%) of which were considered viable for in vitro maturation. All selected oocytes were matured for 27 h at 38.50 0C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 in humidified air. 25 mm hepes-buffered TCM-199 supplemented with 2 mm sodium pyruvate, 1mm l-glutamine, penicillin (75 mg/ml), streptomycin (50 mg/ml) and 10% fetal calf serum was used for in vitro maturation. Following maturation, matured COCs were examined to investigate for first polar body formation. The morphocytometric assessment was performed using the motic image plus (MIP) software with an inverted microscope. Morphocytometric examination results showed highly significant differences (p<0.001) among groups of matured oocytes (zona pellucida thickness; <13 µm, cumulus oophorus thickness; < 10 µm and oocytes diameter; < 100 µm), where the rates were 63.39%, 33.59% and 30.58%, respectively. The results of morphocytometric evaluation based on zona pellucida thickness, cumulus oophorus thickness and oocyte diameter of the total 765 cultured oocytes showed that 197 oocytes (25.75%) were classified as excellent mature, 108 oocytes (14.11%) as mature good, 203 oocytes (26.53%) as immature and 257 oocytes (33.59%) were considered as degenerated. It is concluded thatthe oocytes rates differed according to the parameters (cumulus oophorus, oocytes diameter, zona pellucida).

a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).