Preliminary Comments Regarding the Impact of A.D. Biophytomodulators on Fodder Quality and Weight-Gain in Broilers
Abstract
We have tested energetic-balancing devices in order to find out to what extent they have an impact on meat-production increase in broilers. We have employed ROSS 308 hybrids divided into four groups (each group made up by ten chickens – five males and five females): 3 experimental and one control. The following biophytomodulators were used: DEA (water–energizing device), F (of unknown structure created for animals) and DIEE (energy loading- and balancing device). The best weight gains in the average weight were attained with the F biophytomodulator (2344 g), followed by the control (2318g), the group with DEA (2217 g) and last the group with DIEE (2197 g). DEA and DIEE biophytostimulators did not stimulate any substantial weight gain for the broilers, compared to registered values for the control. F was the only biophytomodulator inducing an increase in weight gain beyond that of the control. However, its values were fairly close to those of the control.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
