Implications of Farrowing Crates on Welfare Lactating Sows

  • Viorel ANDRONIE University “Spiru Haret”, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, 021127 Bucharest, Masina de Paine, 47, Romania
  • Monica PARVU University “Spiru Haret”, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, 021127 Bucharest, Masina de Paine, 47, Romania
  • Ioana ANDRONIE University “Spiru Haret”, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, 021127 Bucharest, Masina de Paine, 47, Romania
  • Alexandru DUMITRU University “Spiru Haret”, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, 021127 Bucharest, Masina de Paine, 47, Romania
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15835/buasvmcn-vm:1:68:6725

Abstract

The research monitored the welfare evolution of lactating sows that were housed in farrowing crates, in commercial farms, based on the skin lesions and lameness. The observations were carried out on lactating sows (Mangalitza, n: 40), during their entire lactation period and the animals were grouped in two lots: A lots, housed in farrowing crates with continuous, concrete flooring on 75% of the surface and a type of grate in the defecation area for the sows and the piglets to use (25%); B lot, housed in improved farrowing crates featuring discontinuous plastic flooring on the entire surface of the box. The skin lesions on the sow and piglets were assessed by inspection on days 7th, 15th, 24th following farrowing. The number of sows displaying skin lesions was higher in A lot (59%) compared to B lot (41%), while skin lesions in piglets was 65% for the B lot compared to 35% for A lot. The monitored indicators varied in both types of farrowing crates. Welfare of lactating sows must be assessed depending on the animals' housing system.
Published
2011-10-31
Issue
Vol. 1 No. 68 (2011): Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca. Veterinary Medicine
Section
Research Articles
 Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

b) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).